Quote:
Originally Posted by The End  I think he mentioned bikers because someone earlier had mentioned them. Of course, for me, I stay out of rough bars anymore. However, one never knows who you may end up dealing with. I think the point he was making was sometimes people over simplify things concerning bikers, skinheads, Crips, etc. he makes some good points. They rarely fight one on one, often use weapons, and not all of them are out of shape push-overs. What's ridiculous about that? |
Because there is no logical form of unarmed self defense against a gang of people with weapons. The only ways to logically address this situation are:
1. Run.
2. Talk your way out.
3. Call for help.
4. Use a weapon.
I was simply trying to say that a trained fighter is going to be better at handling a one on one situation than your best street fighter and everyone automatically jumped to "What if he has friends/what if he has a weapon". If we're going to make this jumps in scenarios then fine, I can go with
"What if I was actually bigger and stronger than I am now and had my Black Belt in BJJ and was a Muay Thai champion who also happened to be carrying an Ak-47?"
Avoiding answering a question by changing the scenario is not an argument I want to get into because it's a never ending argument.
See what I'm saying?
I see Dravens point that you might be facing someone who is actually quite good at fighting, and that I part I do agree with. That's always the assumption, that's why IT'S BEST TO TRAIN AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL POSSIBLE.