Quote:
Originally Posted by Joemoplata  Because there is no logical form of unarmed self defense against a gang of people with weapons. The only ways to logically address this situation are:
1. Run.
2. Talk your way out.
3. Call for help.
4. Use a weapon.
I was simply trying to say that a trained fighter is going to be better at handling a one on one situation than your best street fighter and everyone automatically jumped to "What if he has friends/what if he has a weapon". If we're going to make this jumps in scenarios then fine, I can go with
"What if I was actually bigger and stronger than I am now and had my Black Belt in BJJ and was a Muay Thai champion who also happened to be carrying an Ak-47?"
Avoiding answering a question by changing the scenario is not an argument I want to get into because it's a never ending argument.
See what I'm saying?
I see Dravens point that you might be facing someone who is actually quite good at fighting, and that I part I do agree with. That's always the assumption, that's why IT'S BEST TO TRAIN AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL POSSIBLE. |
I agree. I guess it is like insurance. there is OK coverage, good coverage, excellent coverage, neither is going to stop/prevent a accident. Its best to get the best coverage as possible.
__________________
What do I know? Since I didn't post my styles or experience, I have no experience, no knowledge, no say.
That post before mine, was that for post counting? How about the one after?
Hey, my post count has the same palaverment tone as anyone elses'
|