fighting equipment
Custom Search
 

 

Support Martial-Forums.com


Go Back   Martial Arts Forums - MMA Forums > Mixed Martial Arts > Affiliction

Notices

Affiliction Discuss Affliction Here


Sponsors
MMA Gear
MMA Shorts
MMA Shorts
From $39.99
ElteMMA.com
Gear for Fighters
Top 50 Martial Arts Topsites List

myspace
Reply
Old 07-31-2009, 03:03 PM   #1 (permalink)

Administrator
 
complete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Clemente, CA
Styles: Tae Kwon Do, Tang Soo Do, Hwa Rang Do
Posts: 12,298
Home Country:
complete is a glorious beacon of lightcomplete is a glorious beacon of lightcomplete is a glorious beacon of lightcomplete is a glorious beacon of light



Send a message via Yahoo to complete
BARNETT'S SECOND SAMPLE POSITIVE FOR STEROIDS

BARNETT'S SECOND SAMPLE POSITIVE FOR STEROIDS
Friday, July 31, 2009 - by Steven Marrocco - MMAWeekly.com

Bill Douglas, Assistant Executive Officer to the California State Athletic Commission, informed MMAWeekly.com on Friday that the second sample of Josh Barnett’s pre-fight drug test has come back positive.

Barnett gave two samples of his urine on June 25 as part of the commission’s licensing process for a scheduled fight with Fedor Emelianenko at Affliction “Trilogy” on Aug. 1.

Last Wednesday, CSAC announced that Barnett’s first sample had come back positive for 2a-methyl-5a-androstan-3a-ol-17-one, a compound of synthetic steroid Drostanolone. The commission refused to license him for the fight, effectively canceling it.

Both samples were tested by CSAC’s new testing facility at the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) certified laboratory at UCLA.

In a press release issued Thursday night, Barnett’s manager, Shannon Hooper, claimed the commission had rebuffed several requests for the results of the second sample and vowed to challenge the results.

“Mr. Barnett vehemently denies intentionally ingesting any banned substances in preparation for the Aug. 1 fight and he is looking forward to presenting his case to the California State Athletic Commission,” wrote Hooper.

Douglas wrote he was unaware of any appeal activities being readied by Barnett or his representatives and the matter was not currently on the agenda at CSAC’s next meeting on Aug. 26 in Los Angeles.
complete is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0