You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
When you register, these advertisements will not be displayed.
Japanese Martial ArtsDiscuss Japanese style Martial Arts here - Aikido, Iaido, Jiu Jitsu, Judo, Karate, Kenpo, Kendo, Kyudo, Kyudo, Ninjitsu, Sumo
i do judo, (i just started so i suck) and everyone is telling me that judo beats BJJ but when i look at videos on youtube or some place, they're pretty damn even, so which is stronger, BJJ OR JUDO?
thanks for the replys, but when i met this guy who is a pretty advanced judo guy, not a bb yet though, he fought a blue belt in bjj, and barely won,so isnt that kinda weird? Also isnt blu belt only the 2nd belt? is something like relly, relly wrong with their ranking system, i dont no much about bjj, maybe thats y.
BJJ rankings are: white-blue-purple-brown-black. But it takes a long time to get each (average 2 years per belt so about 10years before your a black belt)
An like was said before depends on a individual!
__________________
'THE GREATEST COURAGE ON EARTH IS TO BEAR DEFEAT WITHOUT LOSING HEART'
I think it depends on the person and where they got their belt. If either person got their belt at a "McDojo" then the grade doesnt really matter because the difference in skill levels will be huge.
My general advice is that you should learn one art really well, no matter what it is, and then find some other parts of other art to supplement your main art. However, that is just me. Someone with greater free time and means might consider learning a second art really well too.
My general advice is that you should learn one art really well, no matter what it is, and then find some other parts of other art to supplement your main art. However, that is just me. Someone with greater free time and means might consider learning a second art really well too.
Perhaps to fill the cup, savor the flavor, consume its contents, and refill it with a different flavor,,,,,
__________________ What do I know? Since I didn't post my styles or experience, I have no experience, no knowledge, no say.
That post before mine, was that for post counting? How about the one after?
Hey, my post count has the same palaverment tone as anyone elses'
Perhaps to fill the cup, savor the flavor, consume its contents, and refill it with a different flavor,,,,,
I think its more of a "This is good, I think if I mix these two drinks together they will be even better" for me. Although, something can be said for those who have the time and money to buy a full cup of something different. But I fear that our analogy will soon confuse the reality of the topic.
"Martial Arts Cocktail" is an interesting term however...
Quote:
Originally Posted by argentinoboyy
yea.....how old are u guys anyway?
The people who responded on this thread are everyone from very young to very old for all sorts of interests and hobbies. Pretty much, the idea that a person is stronger than another person, but an style is not stronger than another style is one of the few things we can find common ground on.
Styles: Western Boxing, Tai Chi, Animal Form Kung Fu, and Wing Chun
Posts: 1,581
Home Country:
To me training makes a huge difference too. A person can have many physical attributes, but if he hasn't trained realistically ( can you say no-contact sparring ) then a person with less physical attributes that has trained realistically will be more successful. That certainly doesn't mean physical attributes don't mean anything, just not everything.
i wouldnt base an opinion on a martial art on what you see on youtube they are often biased towards one or the other. its down to the person.
I will agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by argentinoboyy
yea.....how old are u guys anyway?
Why do you ask?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chapel
I think its more of a "This is good, I think if I mix these two drinks together they will be even better" for me. Although, something can be said for those who have the time and money to buy a full cup of something different. But I fear that our analogy will soon confuse the reality of the topic.
"Martial Arts Cocktail" is an interesting term however...
The people who responded on this thread are everyone from very young to very old for all sorts of interests and hobbies. Pretty much, the idea that a person is stronger than another person, but an style is not stronger than another style is one of the few things we can find common ground on.
Just because something is mixed, doesnt mean it is going to be good
Quote:
Originally Posted by WC_Lun
To me training makes a huge difference too. A person can have many physical attributes, but if he hasn't trained realistically ( can you say no-contact sparring ) then a person with less physical attributes that has trained realistically will be more successful. That certainly doesn't mean physical attributes don't mean anything, just not everything.
What about training in katas and out-dated or bladed weapons?
__________________ What do I know? Since I didn't post my styles or experience, I have no experience, no knowledge, no say.
That post before mine, was that for post counting? How about the one after?
Hey, my post count has the same palaverment tone as anyone elses'
whats stronger?
Linear Mode
