Full Attack Boxing

[kuroitaka]

For who wants to know more about Full Attack

this is the

Full Attack Boxing:

A- Attacking theories:

1- Non telegraphic.
2- Centralism.
3- Jamming.
4- Interactive parrying.
5- The fast spring back.
6- Hitting moment.
7- Static shake off.
8- Inner diving.
9- Body push.
10- Inner Power.
11- Bamboo stick.
12- Streamlined rebound.
13- Dynamic movement.
14- Narrow streak.
15- Fighting variability.
16- Bow & arrow.
17- Most effect, less muscular and mental effort.
18- Power concentration.
19- Fist Shapes.
20- Intact Block.

B- Punches:

-Straight punch:
1- Leading
2- Rear
3- Down ducking.
4- Out ducking "a- leading hand, b- rear hand"

-Hook punch:
1- Narrow
2- Wide
3- Vertical.
4- Horizontal.
5- Palm.
6- 3/4 coil.
7- Sweeping.
8- Syllabic.
9- Ascending.
10- Descending.
11- Long ranged.
12- Short ranged.
13- Back.

-Uppercut:
1- Vertical.
2- Ascending.
3- Elbow.
4- Forearm.
5- Leading.

-Back Fist "Oraken":
1- Usual
2- Coiled angle.
3- Palm.
4- Forearm.
5- Back.
6- Circularity.

[kuroitaka]

i'd like to Notice that most of our Theories had more than one thing to be explained .
so each theory from these 20 will have the Offensive part
some of them will have the defensive and the Tricking .

i'll explain each theory
and i'm ready for discussion
if i couldn't make it in explaining i'll video it .

[complete]

I applaud you for wanting to get information about your style out there. We can all tell that you are very proud of your style and want to promote it as much as possible.

Don't feel discouraged if not many people know about it. It is still very relatively unknown in the US and other parts of the world.

[Akai Shizuku]

I must applaud you as well. Could you please explain some of your more favoured attacking theories in detail?

[Ninjutsu Panama]

Im quite impess cause u always promote ur art and have a very strong beleive in your system, u r someone to be considered a good martial artist

[Militis]

I am interested to see some of the theories

[Akai Shizuku]

As are many of us.

[kuroitaka]

thank u all .
at the time i'm writing this i'm preparing to go to my faculty and after my faculty it will be the dojo and i won't be back till 11 pm and it is now 9 am in egypt . it is a very busy day today so don't expect alot from me .
i'll explain the theories one by one

[47MartialMan]

Thanks kuro, for your many posts, for sharing, for your conviction, and steadfast to your purpose.....

[kuroitaka]

1) The Non-Telegraphic:

((Not to show up your attack)) this is the simple definition.

A) Attacking:
Not to do any clear attack like, hammer punches, hook punches in beginning and also spinning kicks in beginning. Because they'll be simply telegraphic which is the opposite of our theory.
And what will make most of other martial arts mad about us that we say that their straight (jab) punches are so telegraphic.
Like W.Boxing, karate, kung fu.

B ) Defending:
Now we will make the practitioner train to notice what are the differences between the telegraphic and the non telegraphic attacks, which concludes the takedowns, punches and kicks.
And about how to deal with the attacks or how to defend them, this depends about the practitioner defending level. ((This will be studied after finishing the boxing))

C) Tricking:
You'll just learn the idea and u must find out how you could apply it.
The idea of tricking is simply: "To show up a fake attack which will make the opponent open a gap while trying to defend himself, you make this gap as your target"
An example:
While fighting look at your opponent's legs for 2 seconds – just to make him think that there will be your next attack – now without thinking but your whole power in your leading hand and give him a powerful jab .
And believe me he will be shocked.

About A and B:
You could use them in real fights or competitions .
About C:
Most in competitions because always there will be no time to trick in real fights you have to be direct with caution.
I hope u learned something new.
This theory is a basic theory in all other martial arts but it is the first time to be studied like that way Just in Full Attack.
Wait for another theory
Best wishes
KUROI TAKA
Mohammed Salem

[47MartialMan]

And what will make most of other martial arts mad about us that we say that their straight (jab) punches are so telegraphic.
Like W.Boxing, karate, kung fu

Kuro, you are mistaken to think all boxing and Kung Fu jabs/strikes as telegraphic

Bruce Lee had some non-telegraphic jabs also....



Your so-called "tricking", we have always done.....we made it work well against Aikidoists who are so used to traight forawrd attacks....

Chuck Norris, Skippy Mullens, Joe Lewis, Benny the Jet, and Bill Wallace used many "tricking tactics" in bouts.

As I thought, so far, these you have stated, are nothing new.....the wheel cannot be reinvented-conceptually.

Unless you care to further explain in videos.

[JackG]

agreed, Boxing is all about faking and being non-telegraphic thats where alot of the skill is!

[kuroitaka]

Sir 47 martial man and sir JackG:

I think I said:
This theory is a basic theory in all other martial arts but it is the first time to be studied like that way Just in Full Attack.

And I didn't mention that Bruce lee done any Telegraphic Jabs.
I said we consider SOME of jabs in other martial arts are telegraphic and I mentioned the common three who uses there hand in fighting and I could add the kickboxing to them.
And I said too that we are the first one who made this theory in that form.
If you find it in the other martial arts like how I explained it then please notify me.
I do believe that the JKD got a non telegraphic leading jab but their rear jab is so telegraphic.
And about tricking skills they are many.
We just show the beginners how to trick with this theory.

[47MartialMan]

Originally Posted by kuroitaka

I think I said:
This theory is a basic theory in all other martial arts but it is the first time to be studied like that way Just in Full Attack.

But you are saying that other arts have it and FA is the first to have it. You are going to have to better explain yourself.

Originally Posted by kuroitaka

And I didn't mention that Bruce lee done any Telegraphic Jabs.
I said we consider SOME of jabs in other martial arts are telegraphic and I mentioned the common three who uses there hand in fighting and I could add the kickboxing to them.

But boxing and Kung Fu, do not commonly telgraph their jabs. If you state this, then you havent understood nor trained in either to see that they do not.

Originally Posted by kuroitaka

And I said too that we are the first one who made this theory in that form.
If you find it in the other martial arts like how I explained it then please notify me.

Bocxing, JKD, Kung Fu, even Ninjutsu, for eaxmples. If you had thoroughly studied and trained in these, you would understand

I do believe that the JKD got a non telegraphic leading jab but their rear jab is so telegraphic.
And about tricking skills they are many.
We just show the beginners how to trick with this theory. [/quote]

Again, Bruce Lee wasn't about telegraphic his moves. He saw other telegraphing theirs and stop them, or faked to open them up....hence his style. If you thoroughly understood JKD, you wouldnt make this statement either.

I say it over and over. I dont think FA has anything new. It is like others arts who take somethings from others and mix it up thus re-labeling it. The wheel cannot be reivented conceotually. A rose by any other name is still a rose and all are fed manure.

[kuroitaka]

because u haven't any nontelegraphic jabs then u think that all jabs are nontelegraphic but look att the jabs of boxing u'll find the opponent notce that they're coming also in the kumite and sanshou and kickboxing .
i haven't seen any body who do punch like bruce lee did . even the masters of jeet kune do now .
but the karate jab is so telegraphic to us Full Attackers .

and i said we are the first who put this explanition .